- mtm3u8
猜你喜歡
2014
0.0分
喜劇片
王祖藍(lán) 杜汶澤 Chapman To 邵音音 詹瑞文 童飛 許紹雄 楊思琦 黃光亮 苑瓊丹 袁祥仁 麥長青 鄧梓峰 林盛斌 錢國偉 徐志雄 梁競徽 江欣燕 古明華 莊鍶敏 盧惠光 魯芬 喬寶寶 王宗堯 石天欣 文凱玲
/
地獄之母(邵音音 飾)派出魔鬼文西(杜汶澤 飾)降臨人間,同天使阿詹(詹瑞文 飾)爭奪“客源”。兩人同時(shí)將目標(biāo)放在了一位名為杜奇風(fēng)(王祖藍(lán) 飾)的男子身上。杜奇風(fēng)有一位交往多年的女友安琦(童菲 飾),無奈安琦的個(gè)性著實(shí)粗暴野蠻,杜奇風(fēng)常常遭到她的拳腳交加,心中很是悶悶不樂。
文西來到了杜奇風(fēng)的身邊,答應(yīng)以靈魂作為交換,滿足他的三個(gè)愿望,于是杜奇風(fēng)許愿希望安琦變得性感火辣。他的愿望成了真,但是..
HD
1990
0.0分
喜劇片
DVD
1992
0.0分
喜劇片
這集,神勇干探陳家駒(成龍 飾)將遠(yuǎn)赴大陸,化身囚犯打入國際軍火毒品走私集團(tuán)的內(nèi)部。在大陸美女公安楊建華(楊紫瓊 飾)的幫助下,家駒順利接近了正在服刑的集團(tuán)成員豹強(qiáng)(元華 飾)。豹強(qiáng)視家駒為心腹,和他策劃越獄行動(dòng)。為了放長線,家駒爽快應(yīng)承了。
他們?cè)姜z后,豹強(qiáng)主張到家駒隨口編出來的家鄉(xiāng)躲避,幸得楊建華提前安排,才沒有漏出馬腳,楊建華自稱家駒妹妹,與他們同行。他們來到香港見到了集團(tuán)的老大猜霸,..
HD
2017
0.0分
喜劇片
HD
2017
0.0分
喜劇片
HD
2003
0.0分
喜劇片
任賢齊 張柏芝 李珊珊 葛民輝 杜汶澤 黃浩然 王天林 森美 阮小儀 劉愷威 李思捷 李楓 張文慈 黃泆潼 吳慧冰 黃琛如 王晶 張仕鏗 李霆鋒 何肇晃 黃卡娜 發(fā)爛渣 吳成達(dá) 楊嘉雯 高寶云 文詩琪 葉景文 董偉強(qiáng) 陸劍青 李正津
/
因忍受不了男友Moses(任賢齊)的平凡,阿Mi狠心與他分手,塞翁失馬焉知禍福,Moses在老人院做義工時(shí),與怪脾氣老頭蛤蚧王成為忘年之交,后者死后,給他留下巨額遺產(chǎn)。蛤蚧王的此舉招致其律師Allen的不滿,他在夜總會(huì)發(fā)泄時(shí)無意中將此事告訴了小姐Didi(張柏芝)。
為將Moses釣到手,Didi使出渾身解數(shù),無奈均不奏效。發(fā)現(xiàn)Moses是絕種好男人后,Didi對(duì)他動(dòng)了真心,兩人開始熱戀,不..
HD
《紐約夜月情》劇情介紹
6080提供影視作品紐約夜月情高清全集在線觀看的影視全集網(wǎng),喜劇片《紐約夜月情》全集作品的導(dǎo)演是沃倫·萊特 ,由Matthew Broderick Jeanne Tripplehorn Tim Guinee 主演,紐約夜月情在豆瓣的評(píng)分為0.0,本片由小編于2025-09-01 23:06更新,希望大家喜歡,可以把《紐約夜月情》推薦給你朋友,本作品的地址為 http://www.longhuahuitong.cn/movie/26907.html
《紐約夜月情》簡介:Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.' By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses. Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together. One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around. While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with hisher partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken. Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...